Link 3:27 URL
Video by "Coffinman
Professor Steven Jones fails to respond
Almost a week has passed now since I formally requested you to appraise "crash physics for everyone":
The article addresses the most fundamental physics principles necessary to examine the possibility of an aluminium-bodied aircraft flying straight into a steel-framed building and not leaving any evidence of its passage on the outside. Steve, you are seen as the head of the truth movement. This request I made to you has been put in public forums, in particular on YouTube. "Crash physics for everyone" is well-known and there are a great number of people who were awaiting your reply with baited breath.
Your failure to reply is damning, and I have made sure to point out that the reason for your silence is because YOU CAN MAKE NO NEGATIVE RESPONSE TO IT. This is especially unfortunate for Mark Bilk, who made a vicious attack on the genuine researchers for the truth of what happened on S11 during which he put his foot in his mouth a number of times. I have made a response to his offensive diatribe and pointed out errors in his arguments, and false assertions that he was making:
He is also insisting on talking about planes hitting the towers, and as I told him, "Crash physics for everyone" has been up in front of all of the academics in this movement for some time and has not been refuted, therefore the assertions it contains are UNDISPUTED SCIENTIFIC REASONING.
So he really could have done with you being able to put me down hard. But as I told him, you can't. This would also be a good time to ask you why you introduced the DEROGATORY term "space beam" to describe the directed energy beam weapons that have been suggested as a possible cause for the complete failure of the central cores in both towers, and for the complete disintegration of all the concrete within the towers to nanodust. This term is one word away from "space aliens"? and limits the scope of the hypothesis to an orbital platform. This does not to me seem like the conduct I would expect from a high-level academic engaged in a genuine quest for truthful answers.
People thought it odd that you hadn't responded to my request within ONE DAY! And that was over the thanksgiving holiday period! So now, at day six, I have every right to talk about YOUR INABILITY/REFUSAL TO ANSWER THE POINTS OF PHYSICS PUT FORWARD IN "CRASH PHYSICS FOR EVERYONE".
I hope that this state of affairs will allow many of those who have been misguided by you and your co-workers to see that you are actually trying to prevent a discussion of the evidence that can expose the truths of what happened that day in the most concrete manner. You are not a champion for the truth! You hide under a rock when somebody calls you out to fight!
This is a HUGE, FARTING ELEPHANT IN YOUR LIVING ROOM.
Awaiting your reply,
It is a pity he won't respond because there are many questions that need to be put to him, as he positions himself as leader of the "truth movement" If he sees these pictures he will have an idea of some of the things that I would like to explore with him. But as long as he hides under a rock nothing will be resolved.