Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Bottom homepage disinfo vidoes
NCST
Thermite & Scientific Method
Why Indeed
Billiard Balls
Star Wars Beam Weapon
This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION
(Not ready for sharing the link, yet.)


The "Ambush Interview" by Greg Jenkins
and promoted by Steven Jones.


This video was recorded through deceptive means,
late at night, for what purpose?

4 February 2007



Steven Jones seems to be taking a lot of time to figure out how to possibly discredit Judy Wood and Jim Fetzer, time one would think he'd want to spend doing research on 9/11 truth. He even seems to be taking time to coordinate the work of others on such a discrediting effort. Is this a rational use of time if his goal is getting out scientific information about the events of 9/11? Why is he spending his time this way?


Steven Jones obviously condones the harrassment of Judy Wood and encourages it.

Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins
The ambush "interview" with Greg Jenkins is here: (mp3)
What is the motivation of Greg Jenkins to do a surprise "interview" of someone at a time approaching midnight, after they had driven 600 miles just to be a supportive member of an audience?

Apparently Steven Jones approves of such tactics. So, Steven Jones shouldn't mind an interception of his mail, a canceling of his bank account, a request for him to drive 6oo miles, and then a request to submit to a surprise interview at midnight by a dishonest and manipulative agent -- after being kept awake for 48 hours. Right?

At a time approaching midnight, Dr. Wood did not agree to discuss or "defend" anything.
Is this what Steven Jones considers to be "science"?

Email sent from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins:
Subject: Judy Wood interview
Relayed On: Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 18:24:04 -0500

[Begin quoted email]

From: Greg Jenkins (*** @http://gregjenkins.myfastmail.com)
To: DC 9/11 Truth mailto:dc911truth@googlegroups.com

I just received the following from Dr. Stephen Jones:

Hello, Greg --

Several weeks ago, we launched the Letters section of the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Perhaps you have seen it? Here we invite discussion of "hot" topics without requiring peer-review so as to encourage rapid feedback:  http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters.html

I am writing to invite you to contribute a (short) letter if you will to Topic B:
B. Was a "star-wars" beam weapon used at the WTC?

The reason I ask is this -- Yesterday I watched your interesting interview with Judy Wood on this topic.
(http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017) That was the first time I had heard Dr. Wood on a video, and she does try there to defend the energy-beam from space theory she is promoting.  (Which as you must know, is causing quite a schism in the community right now...)  Jim Fetzer has joined Judy in promoting this energy-beam idea -- he suggests the beam which hit the Towers came from WTC 7 in his Tucson talk, here: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=646337772656177512

I think it would be very valuable to have a Letter to the Journal which provides the URL's to your interview with Dr. Wood, and to Jim F's talk, to allow readers to readily find the video-taped arguments by Judy and Jim F.

Would you be willing to compose then a brief letter to document this, emphasizing your interview?  Pls let me know -- I would appreciate it. I have discussed documenting these two videos in the Letters section with the co-editor, Kevin Ryan, and he agreed that this would be a good idea.

If you do, it would be very helpful IMO to put two photos in your Letter with the text,
1-  The photo you discussed with Judy and

2-- A photo from across the river, showing the smoke from the North Tower blowing "over" the South Tower...  These would provide a preview to your interview.  But that's up to you, of course.

Thanks for your efforts,

STeven J

(PS -- there is also a short clip by John Albanese which shows the dangers of discussing non-evidence based theories publicly, here: http://911blogger.com/node/5474#comment. FYI.  Funny.  )

[End of quoted email]

The following is the google video referenced above by Steven Jones
(which is on a 911blogger post by YT).

This appears to be a second "hit piece" video Steven Jones has
encouraged Greg Jenkins to promote in the Journal Jones directs.
"Disinformation in the Information Age" by John Albanese

Is Steven Jones actively promoting disinformation in the truth movement?
Why, instead, isn't he promoting good science and good presentations of material?

Why is Steven Jones coaching a "hit piece" on a fellow human being?
Why is Steven Jones coaching a "hit piece" on someone who is trying to reveal what happened on 9/11?
What other "hit pieces" has Steven Jones coached?

And, why is Steven Jones so dishonest about what was even discussed in this ambush video?
What is his motive?
What is he trying to hide?

Is Greg Jenkins still paid by the NSA?
Was Greg Jenkins's PhD thesis supported by the NSA? Here are the acknowledgements and URLs:

Annual Report: (who funded this project, who Greg Jenkins is working with, and their ties to Los Alamos)

http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publications/Annual%20Report/annualreport.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/au_prb.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA.





Greg Jenkins goes out of his way
to undermine a 9/11 truth researcher.

Why?

And why does this video by Greg Jenkins differ from the recording made by someone in the room with their hand-held tape recorder?
But, Greg, does this look like a "collapse"?
This interview "interview" around 10:20-10:55 PM on January 10, 2007. Dr. Wood had just driven the 600 miles to Washington, D.C. to attend the talk of Jim Fetzer at the National Press Club and to meet with members of congress on the following day.

What motivates Greg Jenkins to do this?
Does he want researchers to spend their time rebutting his nonsense or finding out what happened on 9/11?
Is this the kind of world we want to create?
Figure 40(a). The tower is being peeled downward. Dark explosions shoot up, while white ones explode outward. Above the white explosions the building has vanished while the lower part awaits termination.

The black building in the foreground is Bankers Trust, a 40-story building. The brown building in the background is WTC7 a 47-story building.A straight line between their roofs would be at about 41-42 stories tall in the location of WTC2. WTC2 began the day as a 110-story building, or about three times the height of the Bankers Trust Building.
Source
Link 34:31 URL independent audio (mp3)
Go here for more pictures like this.

The mp3 audio was recorded by someone's pocket hand-held tape recorder. For some reason, the audio is much clearer and easier to understand than that presented in the video. It is difficult to understand why the expensive recording equipment of Greg Jenkins produced an audio of Judy Wood with such poor quality. It is not clear why the audio does not run at the same rate as the video. (If you run them simultaneously, this becomes clear.)



But, Greg, does this look like a "collapse"?
Figure 40(a). The tower is being peeled downward. Dark explosions shoot up, while white ones explode outward. Above the white explosions the building has vanished while the lower part awaits termination.

The black building in the foreground is Bankers Trust, a 40-story building. The brown building in the background is WTC7 a 47-story building.A straight line between their roofs would be at about 41-42 stories tall in the location of WTC2. WTC2 began the day as a 110-story building, or about three times the height of the Bankers Trust Building.
Source
Go here for more pictures like this.




As for thick clouds not going up and the sun shining brightly on the building, please review the picture below; (link for photo.)

Surely he won't demand we prove it was not a "cloudy day" will he?

Figure 45. Does this look more like a pancake collapse, a volcano, or a dust fountain "bubbler"?
Source

Figure 44. WTC1 smoke obscures WTC 2 destruction. It's like a total eclipse of the sun.
Source

Go here for more pictures like this. Go here for more pictures like this.




1) He correctly introduces me as having a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science, but they incorrectly post on the video that my degree is Materials Science Engineering (around 3:45 in the video).

9/11 Truth: Structural Failures vs.
Controlled Demolitions and Explosions
and Buildings Blown to Kingdom Come
This is a video response to the Preview
of a New 9/11 Truth Documentary
"Improbable Collapse"
Go here for more videos like this.

2) As for thick clouds not going up and the sun shining brightly on the building, please review the picture below; (link for photo.)

Surely he won't demand we prove it was not a "cloudy day" will he?
Figure 40(a). The tower is being peeled downward. Dark explosions shoot up, while white ones explode outward. Above the white explosions the building has vanished while the lower part awaits termination.

The black building in the foreground is Bankers Trust, a 40-story building. The brown building in the background is WTC7 a 47-story building.A straight line between their roofs would be at about 41-42 stories tall in the location of WTC2. WTC2 began the day as a 110-story building, or about three times the height of the Bankers Trust Building.
Source

Figure 44. WTC1 smoke obscures WTC 2 destruction. It's like a total eclipse of the sun.
Source

Go here for more pictures like this. Go here for more pictures like this.

3)






Is Steven Jones actively promoting disinformation in the truth movement?
Why, instead, isn't he promoting good science?












Top homepage disinfo vidoes
NCST
Thermite & Scientific Method
Why Indeed
Billiard Balls
Star Wars Beam Weapon






The 9/11 Files Topsites