Make your own free website on Tripod.com
This page is currently UNDER CONSTRUCTION
The information that is being gathered in this website showing the consistency between the available evidence of what caused the pulverization of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 and the use of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS has, not surprisingly begun to generate a significant body of criticism. Some of it technical, some of it well-meaning and some of it questionable as to motive, intent and origination. 

It can reasonably be assumed that given the clear, direct and unavoidable implications of the theory that DEW destroyed the World Trade Center, the secretive governmental spying and control apparatus might well have an interest in participating via paid agents in the process of criticizing the work here assembled.

In Critics Corner, an effort will be made to comment on some of the criticisms from a variety of perspectives. For instance, where criticisms appear to us to be scientifically valid or plausible, we will acknowledge it and will adjust our theories or explanations accordingly.

Where there is information indicating the critic may be a paid informant or agent of a governmental agency that might be motivating to engage in psychological operations, we will raise these questions by presenting the information we have.

Where the criticism, though invalid, may nonetheless seem worthy of posting here, say, because it is humorous or otherwise of interest, we will also post it.

We have put up a second page, linked from Critics Corner, indicating how critics can apprise themselves of their rights as WHISTLEBLOWERS assuming that some of them might come to their senses in due course.

This introduction concludes with our first and second postings of specific criticisms.

First up is Greg Jenkins' video that was done January 10, 2007, ....


The Greg Jenkins Hit-Piece Attack on Dr. Wood

Greg Jenkins Ambush Hit Job


Steven Jones' Support and Encouragement for this Attack

Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins (2 February 2007)
Steven Jones recruits Greg Jenkins to submit a "hit piece" on Judy Wood.

One must ask why he is actively promoting personal attacks and how he think this benefits "9/11 Truth."


From 9eleven.info

The organization, 9eleven.info, posted the following notice at the top of their homepage:

Video Interview of Judy Wood
- and her unfortunate theories; may they rest in peace. (7 February 2007)

One must ask why they have posted this and how they think this benefits "9/11 Truth."


Response to the Greg Jenkins' Hit-Piece
Attack on Dr. Wood

Greg Jenkins Hit Job Response

Our rebuttal of Mr. Jenkins includes queries based on readliy available information confirming some of Dr. Jenkins' prior work was funded by the US National Security Agency (NSA). Clearly, by virtue of his links with NSA, we need to kinow whether his video is a bought and paid for piece of disinformation?

At some point, perhaps Dr. Jenkins will assure his colleagues in the DC911 Truth movement that his NSA contacts are benign.

We'd like to know whether Dr. Jenkins remains on either an NSA payroll or other govenrmental payrolls as a disinformation agent?

Is any of his other work funded by NSA?

Was he paid for his evening work in videotaping me?

Does Greg claim he no longer has any links with NSA?

Dr. Jenkins NSA links are detailed here:

Was Greg Jenkins's PhD thesis supported by the NSA? Here are the acknowledgements and URLs:

Annual Report: (who funded this project, who Greg Jenkins is working with, and their ties to Los Alamos)

http://www.csr.umd.edu/csrpage/publications/Annual%20Report/annualreport.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/ybco_prl.pdf
http://www.physics.buffalo.edu/cerne/reprints/au_prb.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by NSF grant DMR-9705129 and by funding from the NSA.



Second, we have a very interesting challenge to a few pieces of evidence of DEW offered in critical form by Professor Dutch, from the University of Wisconsin, Green Bay, WI.

Really Nutty 9-11 Physics
30 Jan 2006; Last Update 01 Feb 2007, Professor Dutch. [WI GB]

Vaporizing the World Trade Center
30 Jan 2006; Last Update 01 Feb 2007, Professor Dutch. [WI GB]


Articles

The New “9/11 Hijackers”? 
9 Feb 2006, Andrew Johnson


Comments from Forums

Were Particle Beam Weapons Used to Destroy the WTC?  
Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds hypothesis

Putting "Beam Weapons" to bed with no supper  
VIDEO with Judy Wood

"Present me the information/evidence on 911"
Dennis Kucinich says, "I am Listening carefully"
Greg Jones Hit job


Other interesting Forum Discussions

Excelllent Article ! (not an article, my bad), a published report


"Journal of 9/11 Studies"

Notes on the Emergence of Attack Articles at this site

It is interesting to note how prolific this website/Journal is when it comes to attack pieces. But, it's not clear how this is intended to benefit the 9/11 community. Why would this group want to hamper the research of others?
Note: It is difficult to know what questions to answer, as the linked articles keep changing. However, we will do our best to answer the questions presented, as time allows.


From the website named "Journal of 9/11 Studies"

Statement Regarding Thermite, Part 1
(16 January 2007, 26 January 2007) Robert Moore

“Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers”
(17 January 2007) Steven Jones

“Scientific Critique of Judy Wood’s Paper “The Star Wars Beam Weapon”
(10 January 2007) James Gourley

"The Damage to WTC Bldg's 3 and 6, the debate between the controlled demolition and beam weapons..."
(26 January 2007, 6 February 2007) Tony Szamboti

"What are the Goals in the 9/11 Truth Community?"
(10 January 2007) Steven Jones

"The way forward through published papers and letters"
(30 January 2007) James Gourley

"A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood and Reynolds"
(12 January 2007) Frank Legge.

Steven Jones' Support and Encouragement for Attack pieces

Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins (2 February 2007)
Steven Jones recruits Greg Jenkins to submit a "hit piece" on Judy Wood.




Responses by Others to the Steve E. Jones-Promoted Attack Pieces


The Greg Jenkins Analytical Method Ignores the Facts
28 February 2007, by Andrew Lowe Watson

Highlighting Directed Energy Weapons May Save the World from War
8 February 2007, by Andrew Lowe Watson

Why Indeed Must it be Controlled Demolition?
An informal critique of Dr. Jones' hypothesis
30 January 2007, "Who"

Proper citations, please
Thursday, January 18, 2007

Is South Tower oscillation evidence of a plane? Not necessarily.
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Does NIST's own data prove "no planes," and has Jones failed to disclose that in his "planes" thesis?
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

"Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice" on "misinformation"
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Double standards at the Journal of 9/11 Studies?
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

My concerns about Professor Jones's forensic science
Thursday, January 11, 2007

The little wheel that could not
Sunday, January 7, 2007

The 911-Pound Gorilla in Cato's Room
Saturday, November 11, 2006

The Not-So-Scholarly Scholars for 9/11 Truth
Friday, November 03, 2006

THE DARK SIDE OF PROFESSOR STEVEN E. JONES
December 17, 2005

The New “9/11 Hijackers”? 
9 Feb 2007, Andrew Johnson


Other Comments


Steven Jones’ Contributions to Science, Humanity and the Planet
By CB Brooklyn

Excelllent Article ! (not an article, my bad), a published report

Is there any information that DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS are included, in the arms buildup in the PERSIAN GULF?


Personal Comments

I am "me" doing the best I can do. I consider myself to be an honest person, as well as those who know me. I choose not to be attacked by those who wish to manipulate the truth, but I do understand that such individuals exist. I wish to spend my time on honest research of physical phenomenon and do not wish to invest my time in figuring out how to out-think the game-playing of the opposition. .

If you are "you" doing the best you can do and want to learn more, I will share some of my thoughts with you. These thoughts are not intended for scientific discussions.
About attacking someone
Notes (so far)


CriticsCorner






In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.

© 2006-2007 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved.

The 9/11 Files Topsites