|
The organization, 9eleven.info, posted the following notice at the top of their homepage:
One must ask why they have posted this and how they think this benefits "9/11 Truth." |
| The information that is being gathered in this website showing the consistency between the available evidence of what caused the pulverization of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 and the use of DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS has, not surprisingly begun to generate a significant body of criticism. Some of it technical, some of it well-meaning and some of it questionable as to motive, intent and origination. It can reasonably be assumed that given the clear, direct and unavoidable implications of the theory that DEW destroyed the World Trade Center, the secretive governmental spying and control apparatus might well have an interest in participating via paid agents in the process of criticizing the work here assembled. In Critics Corner, an effort will be made to comment on some of the criticisms from a variety of perspectives. For instance, where criticisms appear to us to be scientifically valid or plausible, we will acknowledge it and will adjust our theories or explanations accordingly. Where there is information indicating the critic may be a paid informant or agent of a governmental agency that might be motivating to engage in psychological operations, we will raise these questions by presenting the information we have. Where the criticism, though invalid, may nonetheless seem worthy of posting here, say, because it is humorous or otherwise of interest, we will also post it. We have put up a second page, linked from Critics Corner, indicating how critics can apprise themselves of their rights as WHISTLEBLOWERS assuming that some of them might come to their senses in due course. This introduction concludes with our first and second postings of specific criticisms. First up is Greg Jenkins' video that was done January 10, 2007, .... |
| Greg Jenkins Ambush Hit Job |
|
Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins (2 February 2007) |
|
The organization, 9eleven.info, posted the following notice at the top of their homepage:
One must ask why they have posted this and how they think this benefits "9/11 Truth." |
| Our rebuttal of Mr. Jenkins includes queries based on readliy available information confirming some of Dr. Jenkins' prior work was funded by the US National Security Agency (NSA). Clearly, by virtue of his links with NSA, we need to kinow whether his video is a bought and paid for piece of disinformation? At some point, perhaps Dr. Jenkins will assure his colleagues in the DC911 Truth movement that his NSA contacts are benign. We'd like to know whether Dr. Jenkins remains on either an NSA payroll or other govenrmental payrolls as a disinformation agent? Is any of his other work funded by NSA? Was he paid for his evening work in videotaping me? Does Greg claim he no longer has any links with NSA? Dr. Jenkins NSA links are detailed here:
|
| Second, we have a very interesting challenge to a few pieces of evidence of DEW offered in critical form by Professor Dutch, from the University of Wisconsin, Green Bay, WI.
Really Nutty 9-11 Physics Vaporizing the World Trade Center |
| Were Particle Beam Weapons Used to Destroy the WTC? Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds hypothesis Putting "Beam Weapons" to bed with no supper VIDEO with Judy Wood "Present me the information/evidence on 911" Dennis Kucinich says, "I am Listening carefully" |
| Greg Jones Hit job |
| Excelllent Article ! (not an article, my bad), a published report |
| It is interesting to note how prolific this website/Journal is when it comes to attack pieces. But, it's not clear how this is intended to benefit the 9/11 community. Why would this group want to hamper the research of others? |
| Note: It is difficult to know what questions to answer, as the linked articles keep changing. However, we will do our best to answer the questions presented, as time allows. |
|
Statement Regarding Thermite, Part 1 “Hard Evidence Repudiates the Hypothesis that Mini-Nukes Were Used on the WTC Towers” “Scientific Critique of Judy Wood’s Paper “The Star Wars Beam Weapon” "The Damage to WTC Bldg's 3 and 6, the debate between the controlled demolition and beam weapons..." "What are the Goals in the 9/11 Truth Community?" "The way forward through published papers and letters" "A study of some issues raised in a paper by Wood and Reynolds" |
|
Email from Steven E. Jones to Greg Jenkins (2 February 2007) |
| The New “9/11 Hijackers”? 9 Feb 2007, Andrew Johnson |
|
|
| Excelllent Article ! (not an article, my bad), a published report Is there any information that DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS are included, in the arms buildup in the PERSIAN GULF? |
|
I am "me" doing the best I can do. I consider myself to be an honest person, as well as those who know me. I choose not to be attacked by those who wish to manipulate the truth, but I do understand that such individuals exist. I wish to spend my time on honest research of physical phenomenon and do not wish to invest my time in figuring out how to out-think the game-playing of the opposition. . If you are "you" doing the best you can do and want to learn more, I will share some of my thoughts with you. These thoughts are not intended for scientific discussions. |
|
CriticsCorner
|
|
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this webpage are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This webpage has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.
© 2006-2007 Judy Wood and the author above. All rights reserved. |
|
